| Issue ID | 1583236 |
| Internal NHTSA # | 11232631 |
| Manufacurer | Toyota Motor Corporation |
| Brand | TOYOTA |
| Model | RX300 |
| Model Year | 2004 |
| File date | 18/04/18 |
| Component | EQUIPMENT:MECHANICAL |
| Product type code | EQUIPMENT |
| Description of the problem | Claim sdvik110 the incident which occurred on april 19th of 2018, occurred when hertz corporation made remarks that were not only slanderous but defaming to the plaintiff, [xxx] name and reputation. Hertz corporation allege that the plaintiff committed the crime of theft, which is a felony criminal offense. This crime is punishable by imprisonment. Hertz corporation has claimed that the plaintiff did not return a rental vehicle in the time required, per the terms of the written contract. This statement is false given that [xxx] returned to this vehicle to the agreed location, even prior to the date and time that it was due to be delivered. [xxx] has provided this office with evidence that will prove that she did in fact return the vehicle to 3. Prior to leaving the hertz lot where the vehicle was originally rented, (3851 el cajon boulevard san diego california 92105) an inspection was conducted on this vehicle. The vehicle inspection consisted of checking the exterior for physical damage and interior for physical damage. It was during this time that the representative for hertz and [xxx] noted visible exterior damage to the vehicle. Both the representative and plaintiff took photographs and have written documentation of the damage noted to the vehicle prior to rental. It was also during the rental of this vehicle, [xxx] made attempts to contact the corporate office and report that this vehicle was in unsafe condition. This is a vehicle that in regards to the national highway traffic safety administration, this vehicle would be deemed as unsafe for the roadways. The hertz corporation refuse to provide [xxx] with an alternate or alternative vehicle that was safe for the roadway and refuse to acknowledge that [xxx] did not feel safe and that this vehicle was a danger to not only herself, but others on the roadway. 4. [xxx] was maliciously accused of not only damaging this vehicle during its time of rental, but then never returning it information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia |
| Vehicle Mileage at Failure | |
| Number of Occurences | 1 |
| Source of the issue | NHTSA WEB SITE |
| City and State | SAN DIEGO, CA |
| VIN pattern | XXXXXX |
| Was vehicle invloved in a crash? | N |
| Was vehicle involved in a fire? | N |
| Was incedent reported to police? | N |
| Was medical attention required? | N |
| Was part original equipment? | N |
| No. of injured persons | |
| No. of fatalities | |
| Date of purchase | 07/08/26 |
| Was original owner? | |
| Anti-lock brakes | |
| Cruise control | |
| Number of cylinders | |
| Drive train type | |
| Transmission type | |
| Vehicle speed | |
| DoT tire identifier | |
| Tire size | |
| Location of tire code | |
| Type of tire failure code | |
| Was defective tire repaired? | |
| Date of manufacture | |
| Type of child seat code | |
| Type of restraint | |
| Dealer's name | |
| Dealer's telephone number | |
| Dealer's city | |
| Dealer's state code | |
| Dealer's ZIP code |