| Issue ID | 1369179 |
| Internal NHTSA # | 10970999 |
| Manufacurer | Toyota Motor Corporation |
| Brand | TOYOTA |
| Model | PRIUS V |
| Model Year | 2016 |
| File date | 02/04/17 |
| Component | UNKNOWN OR OTHER |
| Product type code | VEHICLE |
| Description of the problem | While driving city streets at a maximum speed of 55,on sunday 4/2/17, my windshield must have been hit by a small stone. I did not notice when it happened. On monday, 4/3/16, i noticed a small mark on the windshield which i mistook for a bug. I later noticed a small line coming from the "bug" which i mistook for fluid. By tuesday, 4/4/17, there were "lines" in both directions and i realized that i had a cracked windshield. By wednesday, the crack was 16" in length. I took my car to toyota service and was told that they were not responsible under warranty; this is something that was caused by "impact". The car has 8400 miles on it. My concern is with the quality of that windshield. If a small pebble can cause that much damage, it seems to me that this is an inferior product. I have driven for 49 yrs in different climates, through blizzards, hailstorms, and had flying debris hit my windshields. I have had fender benders and been rear-ended. Never have i had a broken windshield. A windshield that is this delicate is a safety issue. It seems to me, that in this world of profit-driven choices, that the windshields are being made cheaper, and therefore less effective in terms of protection. I wonder what would have happened if it were more than a pebble that flew at my car. In ca, it is illegal to drive with a cracked windshield. So now i am in the predicament of getting this fixed immediately. Handily for toyota, they won't replace it gratis, so it is a nice $1,300. 00 repair job for them. They pleasantly advised me that my insurance would cover the $800. 00 overage of my $500 deductible. With the issue at hand being my safety and compliance with the law, i have little choice. Cheap windshields must create a regular base of repair work for all the automakers who use this particular auto glass. This should be seriously considered in terms of vehicle safety. |
| Vehicle Mileage at Failure | 8350 |
| Number of Occurences | |
| Source of the issue | NHTSA WEB SITE |
| City and State | LA QUINTA, CA |
| VIN pattern | JTDZN3EU6GJXXXXXX |
| Was vehicle invloved in a crash? | N |
| Was vehicle involved in a fire? | N |
| Was incedent reported to police? | N |
| Was medical attention required? | N |
| Was part original equipment? | |
| No. of injured persons | |
| No. of fatalities | |
| Date of purchase | 07/08/26 |
| Was original owner? | N |
| Anti-lock brakes | N |
| Cruise control | N |
| Number of cylinders | |
| Drive train type | |
| Transmission type | |
| Vehicle speed | 55 |
| DoT tire identifier | |
| Tire size | |
| Location of tire code | |
| Type of tire failure code | |
| Was defective tire repaired? | |
| Date of manufacture | |
| Type of child seat code | |
| Type of restraint | |
| Dealer's name | |
| Dealer's telephone number | |
| Dealer's city | |
| Dealer's state code | |
| Dealer's ZIP code |