| Issue ID | 1079646 |
| Internal NHTSA # | 10605351 |
| Manufacurer | Nissan North America, Inc. |
| Brand | NISSAN |
| Model | PATHFINDER |
| Model Year | 2007 |
| File date | 26/05/14 |
| Component | POWER TRAIN |
| Product type code | VEHICLE |
| Description of the problem | I am a very loyal nissan/pathfinder owner. I'm on my second pathfinder and always have my beloved 2007 serviced regularly at the puyallup nissan dealership. Because i rely on my vehicle for work, i make sure to keep it current with all recommended services over the life of the vehicle. Until recently, ive been an extremely satisfied pathfinder owner. Now, i am quite upset that a known defective radiator notice i received approximately a year ago, advised to do nothing if experiencing no problems, but now that i'm over the limit of 100k miles (115k), and experiencing the known radiator defect issue, i am now on the hook for the entire repair cost ($5000). I've researched the issue which can be summarized at http://www. Nissanproblems. Com/problems/transmission. Shtml what does the miles matter? Does nissan's obligation to their product and customer disappear after 100k miles? Why didn't nissan recommend replacing the radiators, as a preventative measure? Further research of testimonials from other nissan owners experiencing the same issue, suggests that the radiator problem seemed to typically occur after 100,000 miles anyways. So how is it that nissan is ok with leaving their customer holding on to the (crud) end of the stick? I sure hope i am reimbursed for the hefty bill some way some day. (i've not yet pulled the trigger on having the repairs done, as i have been contemplating trading in and giving the problem back to the dealer, but how will this affect the trade in value, and if nissan's past reputation is diminishing, why do i want to trade in for another nissan. My passion for pathfinders has suddenly dropped considerably... Time for a new brand maybe.....:-((((( very disgruntled pathfinder owner, [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u. S. C. 552(b)(6). |
| Vehicle Mileage at Failure | 115000 |
| Number of Occurences | 1 |
| Source of the issue | NHTSA WEB SITE |
| City and State | TACOMA, WA |
| VIN pattern | 5N1AR18W97CXXXXXX |
| Was vehicle invloved in a crash? | N |
| Was vehicle involved in a fire? | N |
| Was incedent reported to police? | N |
| Was medical attention required? | N |
| Was part original equipment? | |
| No. of injured persons | 0 |
| No. of fatalities | 0 |
| Date of purchase | 07/08/26 |
| Was original owner? | N |
| Anti-lock brakes | N |
| Cruise control | N |
| Number of cylinders | 6 |
| Drive train type | |
| Transmission type | |
| Vehicle speed | |
| DoT tire identifier | |
| Tire size | |
| Location of tire code | |
| Type of tire failure code | |
| Was defective tire repaired? | |
| Date of manufacture | |
| Type of child seat code | |
| Type of restraint | |
| Dealer's name | |
| Dealer's telephone number | |
| Dealer's city | |
| Dealer's state code | |
| Dealer's ZIP code |